It still hasn’t quite hit me that I’ll be witnessing the coronation—alongside my Royally Obsessed podcast co-host Roberta Fiorito—of King Charles III from across the pond in London in a little less than a week’s time. In conversations with Roberta, we’ve been reflecting each week about what to expect on May 6—from the pomp and pageantry of it all to whether or not Prince Harry and Meghan Markle would make the trip over in the wake of Spare. (We recently got an answer to the latter—Harry will be there; Meghan will not.)
Yes, I’ll miss Meghan’s presence greatly (with deep respect for what was likely her choice to prioritize her mental health and son Archie’s fourth birthday over the Crown), but there’s another royal absence I can’t stop thinking about: Diana’s.
It’s been a little over 25 years since Princess Diana tragically died in a car crash in Paris and almost 30 years since Diana, in a conversation with the BBC’s Panorama and Martin Bashir—an interview we’ve since learned was deceitfully obtained—shared her thoughts on whether or not Charles was fit to be king.
Speaking specifically on the matter of a future King Charles, she said: “Being Prince of Wales produces more freedom now and being King would be a little bit more suffocating. And because I know the character, I would think that the top job, as I call it, would bring enormous limitations to him and I don’t know whether he could adapt to that.”